Shell marketing consultant quits, accusing agency of ‘excessive harms’ to surroundings | Shell

A senior safety consultant has quit working with Shell after 11 years, accusing the fossil gas producer in a bombshell public video of causing “excessive harms” to the environment.

Caroline Dennett claimed Shell had a “disregard for local weather change risks” and urged others in the oil and fuel industry to “stroll away whereas there’s nonetheless time”.

The executive, who works for the unbiased company Clout, ended her working relationship with Shell in an open letter to its executives and 1,400 staff. In an accompanying video, posted on LinkedIn, she said she had give up because of Shell’s “double-talk on climate”.

Dennett accused the oil and fuel agency of “working past the design limits of our planetary methods” and “not putting environmental safety earlier than manufacturing”.

She mentioned: “Shell’s stated security ambition is to ‘do no hurt’ – ‘Purpose Zero’, they name it – and it sounds honourable but they're fully failing on it.

“They know that continued oil and fuel extraction causes extreme harms, to our local weather, to our surroundings and to people. And whatever they are saying, Shell is solely not winding down on fossil fuels.”

Dennett told the Guardian she “could not marry these conflicts with my conscience”, including: “I couldn't carry that any longer, and I’m able to cope with the implications.”

Shell was a “major shopper” of Dennett’s enterprise, which specialises in evaluating safety procedures in high-risk industries including oil and gasoline production. She began working with Shell in the aftermath of BP’s Deepwater Horizon oil spill in 2010, which rocked the trade.

“I can not work for a corporation that ignores all the alarms and dismisses the dangers of climate change and ecological collapse,” she stated. “As a result of, opposite to Shell’s public expressions around web zero, they don't seem to be winding down on oil and gas, but planning to explore and extract much more.”

Dennett – a legal justice graduate who has spent her career in research and consultancy – was impressed to stop working with Shell after watching information footage of Extinction Riot local weather protesters urging the corporate’s workers to leave. The motion’s TruthTeller whistleblowing venture encourages oil and gasoline workers to stroll away from the trade.

The guide, who runs inner safety surveys and relies in Weymouth, Dorset, acknowledged she was “privileged” to be able to stroll away and “many people working in fossil gas firms just aren’t so fortunate”.

She urged Shell’s executives to “look within the mirror and ask themselves in the event that they really consider their imaginative and prescient for extra oil and fuel extraction secures a protected future for humanity”.

In late 2020, several Shell executives in its clean energy sector left amid reviews they had been annoyed at the tempo of Shell’s shift in the direction of greener fuels.

Her announcement comes on the eve of Shell’s AGM in London on Tuesday. Its plans to scale back emissions might be mentioned at the meeting the place the Dutch activist group Comply with This will push for the corporate’s policies to be more according to the Paris local weather accord. Shell’s board has informed investors to reject the group’s resolution that asks it to set extra stringent local weather goals.

The Shell investor Royal London has stated it intends to abstain on a vote on the firm’s local weather transition proposals.

The Shell chief govt, Ben van Beurden, might expertise an investor revolt against his £13.5m pay packet on the AGM after the funding adviser Pirc urged a vote in opposition to it.

Signal up to the day by day Business Immediately e mail or follow Guardian Business on Twitter at @BusinessDesk

A Shell spokesperson said: “Be in little question, we are decided to deliver on our international technique to be a internet zero firm by 2050 and 1000's of our persons are working hard to realize this. We have now set targets for the short, medium and long run, and have every intention of hitting them.

“We’re already investing billions of dollars in low-carbon power, though the world will nonetheless want oil and gas for many years to return in sectors that can’t be easily decarbonised.”

Shell also faces the prospect of a potential windfall tax to fund cuts to household payments after the power business reported bumper profits fuelled by the increase in market costs, prompting opposition events to call on the government to herald a one-off levy.

On Monday, the biggest oil and fuel producer in the North Sea spoke out against a one-off levy, arguing it might result in the trade approving fewer initiatives.

Harbour Power’s chief govt, Linda Cook, informed the Monetary Occasions: “A better tax burden will make it more challenging for brand spanking new oil and gasoline projects to meet investment hurdle charges, which means fewer initiatives can be sanctioned.

“This is at a time when trade is being inspired to increase home UK oil and gas production and help an orderly vitality transition.”

Harbour has advised the government it plans to invest $6bn in the North Sea over three years as trade makes its case in opposition to the tax. The Guardian revealed this month that Prepare dinner had received a £4.6m “golden hi there” from the firm.